16th century theatre why study it

Although William Shakespeare and Ben Jonson were actors, the majority do not seem to have been performers, and no major author who came on to the scene after is known to have supplemented his income by acting. Not all of the playwrights fit modern images of poets or intellectuals. Christopher Marlowe was killed in an apparent tavern brawl, while Ben Jonson killed an actor in a duel. Several probably were soldiers. However, they had no ownership of the plays they wrote.

Once a play was sold to a company, the company owned it, and the playwright had no control over casting, performance, revision or publication.

The profession of dramatist was challenging and far from lucrative. This was probably at the low end of the range, though even the best writers could not demand too much more.

A playwright, working alone, could generally produce two plays a year at most; in the s Richard Brome signed a contract with the Salisbury Court Theatre to supply three plays a year, but found himself unable to meet the workload.

Shakespeare produced fewer than 40 solo plays in a career that spanned more than two decades; he was financially successful because he was an actor and, most importantly, a shareholder in the company for which he acted and in the theatres they used. Ben Jonson achieved success as a purveyor of Court masques, and was talented at playing the patronage game that was an important part of the social and economic life of the era.

Those who were playwrights pure and simple fared far less well; the biographies of early figures like George Peele and Robert Greene, and later ones like Brome and Philip Massinger, are marked by financial uncertainty, struggle, and poverty. Playwrights dealt with the natural limitation on their productivity by combining into teams of two, three, four, and even five to generate play texts; the majority of plays written in this era were collaborations, and the solo artists who generally eschewed collaborative efforts, like Jonson and Shakespeare, were the exceptions to the rule.

Dividing the work, of course, meant dividing the income; but the arrangement seems to have functioned well enough to have made it worthwhile. The truism that says, diversify your investments, may have worked for the Elizabethan play market as for the modern stock market.

Modern understanding of collaboration in this era is biased by the fact that the failures have generally disappeared with barely a trace; for one exception to this rule, see: Sir Thomas More.

Most playwrights, like Shakespeare for example, wrote in verse. Genres of the period included the history play, which depicted English or European history. History plays dealt with more recent events, like A Larum for London which dramatizes the sack of Antwerp in Tragedy was an amazingly popular genre.

Faustus and The Jew of Malta. Comedies were common, too. A subgenre developed in this period was the city comedy, which deals satirically with life in London after the fashion of Roman New Comedy. Though marginalised, the older genres like pastoral The Faithful Shepherdess , , and even the morality play Four Plays in One , ca.

After about , the new hybrid subgenre of the tragicomedyenjoyed an efflorescence, as did the masque throughout the reigns of the first two Stuart kings, James I and Charles I. A little over plays were published in the period as a whole, most commonly in individual quarto editions. Through much of the modern era, it was thought that play texts were popular items among Renaissance readers that provided healthy profits for the stationers who printed and sold them.

By the turn of the 21st century, the climate of scholarly opinion shifted somewhat on this belief: some contemporary researchers argue that publishing plays was a risky and marginal business—though this conclusion has been disputed by others.

Some of the most successful publishers of the English Renaissance, like William Ponsonby or Edward Blount, rarely published plays. Politically, playwrights and actors were clients of the monarchy and aristocracy, and most supported the Royalist cause. Was there any point where the actor would actually speak to the audience directly? For example like now a days one actor might ask the actor, Can you believe this guy? Like that. Hey Justin I was wondering what types of characters they had in the Elizabethan era theatre?

Like protagonists and antagonists… Stuff like that! Thanks Jemma. Jemma, every type of character you can imagine was right there on the Elizabethan stage. His tragedies were full of strong protagonists like Lear, Hamlet and Macbeth.

Excellent summary! There are no dialogue words in those in those scenes to denote the specific setting. So how did he do it? Interesting question John. Shakespeare normally left clues in the spoken text for the audience to determine setting if it was not clear, however you have said this is not the case in this example.

B how do these convention help in shaping the overall story of the film,esp. In the scene where mercucio dresses as a female? Sorry Deborah, unfortunately I am unable to offer any worthwhile information on the comic conventions in Twelfth Night. Hi Justin, I am wondering if you have any information on comic conventions in Twelfth Night? I would be very interested to read your thoughts and gain better insight.

I came a little late to this party, looking for a discussion of the aside in stagecraft and found just what I was looking for here. Thanks for that, I was having a hard time finding concise notes on Elizabethan theatrical conventions.

Thank you so much for this. Very useful. This is really helpful. It is often so difficult to pin point exactly how to explain students how this style of theatre works and to give them other examples other than Shakespeare. Skip to content Historically, Elizabethan theatre refers to plays performed in England during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I Table of Contents.

Post navigation Previous Previous. Next Continue. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Thanks Catherine. Sorry, I cannot find the link you are referring to…. Thanks but please all those listed are they the techniques of Elizabethan drama.

Hey Justin, Are there any physical conventions such as movement or gesture which were used in English renaissance theater? It was great. The irony! Google Tag Manager. Skip to Content Skip to Navigation. Search Google Appliance Enter the terms you wish to search for. Why should we study Elizabethan Theatre?

Loading Video Audio Embed Code. Embed HELP.