How many books were omitted from the bible

Back then, the Bible comprised a total of 80 books along with also the past 14 books, which now have been excluded, composed the ending of the Old Testament and were as follows:. In each of these books was removed from all variations except for a version, which was the first edition translated into English. He had been the son of David and is alleged to be the cleverest man who has always lived.

It appears that Solomon was talking of Jesus. However, Jesus was born approximately years following his departure. Let us consider why this might be that Solomon was speaking about;. This truly disrupts everything we thought we understood. Solomon really and genuinely seems terrible. Did you know that the bible was made up of around 80 books when the bible was first translated from Latin to English by the Vatican in ?

However, 14 books were voted for removal in That messes with the history just a little…. In the year the Bible was translated from Latin into English. Back then the Bible contained a total of 80 books and the last 14 books, which today have been excluded, made up the end of the Old Testament and were as follows:. So why then does everyone continue to call him Jesus, when the letter J did not even being used at the time?

He was the son of David and is alleged to be the wisest man that has ever lived. He is painted largely as a benevolent figure. But what you read in this book will make you question everything you were told to believe about him. He upbraideth us with our offending of the law, and ojecteth to our infamy the transgression of our education. Why did the Vatican vote to have these 14 books removed from the Bible? Why did Solomon sound so crazy and evil in this book?

It seems that Solomon was speaking of Jesus. But Jesus was born roughly years after his death. And one last thing I would like to point out is when Solomon says;. Let us oppress the poor righteous man, let us not spare the widow, nor reverence the ancient gray hairs of the aged.

This really disrupts everything we thought we knew. Solomon really and truly sounds evil. He is also alleged to be the wisest man in history. Interestingly, Solomon is a man who was engulfed in the occult, he worshiped multiple gods and was weak for women.

And the famous Temple of Solomon is considered to be the spiritual birth place of Freemasonry, a movement that is at the highest levels associated with pulling the strings of major global events and argued to be the true controlling power of our world.

Join the Urban Intellectuals family list to receive the latest news and updates from our team. Most of the books you said are no in the Bible are really in the Bible..

It is this unknown god that gnosticism claims to reveal. At the heart of the Gospel of Judas is a revelation of this unknown god.

Irenaeus explicitly said that the gnostics wrote many different gospels and books, but he, along with all other church leaders of the second through fourth centuries, regarded them as grossly inaccurate and harmful in what they taught. At various points in the history of the church, individuals have emerged who have challenged what books should be in the Bible—either by wanting to eliminate some or to add others.

The important point here is that the churches already knew what the books of the Bible were; these were the ones they were already using in their teaching and worship. These books had just not been officially recognized. One of the earliest challenges to the commonly recognized collection of books that the churches were using as Scripture came from a man named Marcion. He was a wealthy and prominent church leader who lived in the early second century AD in a coastal city of northern Asia Minor today this is in the country of Turkey.

He was passionate about the writings of the apostle Paul but had a very skewed idea of what they taught. Ultimately, he advocated that only ten letters of the apostle Paul should be accepted as Scripture as well as the Gospel of Luke; all others should be rejected including the Old Testament.

Because of his wealth and influence, the churches of the Mediterranean world had to respond. This challenge became a huge motivation for the churches to declare formally and publicly what books they had already been using as Scripture.

So, as early as the second century AD, the church began developing the concept of the canon of Scripture to distinguish those books that were regarded as inspired by God and thus carried divine authority. By the time of Jesus, the thirty-nine books that constituted the Hebrew Bible what we call the Old Testament were widely recognized within Judaism as the Bible.

As for the twenty-seven books that we know as the New Testament, these were formally recognized as the canon of Scripture in the second through the fourth centuries. The earliest church leaders regularly quote passages from the various New Testament documents giving them authority as divine revelation in a way that distinguishes them from any other writings. It is important to realize, though, that from the moment the four Gospels Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were written, they were copied and circulated throughout the extent of the world where churches had been planted—Israel, Syria, Asia Minor, Egypt, Greece, Italy, and elsewhere.

The name of the book has created a lot of confusion because no one seems to have a solid understanding of who actually named the book 2 Ezra. Across many different versions of the Bible you will see 2 Ezra named something completely different. The book of Tobit is about Tobit and his family living outside of Israel as exiles. Tobit eventually goes blind and is forced to send his son, Tobias, on a journey with the angel Raphael disguised as a human.

This is when Tobias meets Sarah who is possessed by a demon, but Raphael is able to intervene and expel the demon allowing Tobias and Sarah to marry. They then return to Tobit and his sight returns. He eventually dies of old age as a happy man because God was able to intervene. This book is not entirely believed to be the true work of God.

Instead, it is considered a folk tale due to the outlandish nature of some of the text in the book. That said, there are still plenty of deep rooted Biblical morals and even practical information outlined in this book. Its gallbladder, heart, and liver are useful medicines. He cooked the fish and ate it; and the remaining part of it, which he salted, he put aside. Then they both journeyed together until they approached Media.

The story of Judith focuses on a young woman who is upset with everyone around her for not trusting God to deliver what they need. She goes with her maid to a nearby camp with an enemy general named Holofernes who is preparing to battle against the very men she is trying to help. Holofernes is able to coerce her into providing information about the whereabouts of the Israelites. She ends up gaining his trust and he allows her access to his tent one evening when he is drunk.

All the people who were led by him disperse. The result of the story is a victory for the Israelites but Judith remains unmarried for the rest of her life. It is generally believed that this book blends truth and fiction. The reason this book was left out of the Bible could very well be due to the fact that the story cannot be verified as true.

This book was left out of the Bible as revisions and updates have been made over the years. Whether the story is true or not, this book is a testament to how Judith had confidence in the work of God and was not afraid. It is believed that the additional sections that were removed from the book of Esther were written by an Egyptian Jew around BC. The goal was to give the Bible a more religious tone and to indicate that Jews were saved due to their piety. The additions changed the tone of the book completely and for that reason, were never included.

This is a big indicator that a lot of the pieces of the Bible that were excluded were done so with the intention of increasing the accuracy of the information and focusing more on the word of God. A lot of the books that were removed were not referenced by Jesus. This is true for all the apocryphal writings. The Catholic Church continues to believe that Soloman did not write this book. Of course, there is no way to know for certain who the author is.